Skip to main content
Aurora CognitiveAurora Cognitive

INTEGRATIONS AND DATA

One version of the truth, moved reliably

Connecting systems that were never meant to talk, with event schemas, idempotent writes, retries and reconciliation you can read.

Trace one broken handoff

30 minutes with an engineer, no sales call

What this is

Data that agrees across every system

Integration work starts with the shape of the data, not the connector. We define the events each system emits and consumes, make every write safe to repeat, handle the failures that will happen anyway, and produce a reconciliation report that shows both sides matching. When a record goes missing, you can see where it stopped instead of comparing exports by hand.

This is for you if

  • Two systems hold the same customer or order, and your team decides which one to believe case by case.
  • A nightly job moves data, and nobody finds out it failed until someone asks about a missing record.
  • Finance and operations report different numbers for the same month and the difference takes days to explain.

This is not the right fit if you run one system and have no reporting requirement across others. There is nothing to reconcile, and adding a pipeline would create a moving part that only needs maintenance.

Scope

What we build

01

Schema definition

The events and fields each system emits and accepts, versioned and documented before any connector is written.

02

Connectors

Adapters for each system that translate to the shared schema, so a change in one vendor does not spread across the rest.

03

Queue or pipeline

A durable path between systems with ordering rules and idempotent writes, so a repeated message cannot duplicate a record.

04

Retry and dead letter handling

Failed messages retried with backoff, then parked with the payload and the reason, ready to replay after a fix.

05

Reconciliation reports

Scheduled comparisons between source and destination that name the records that differ, not just a count.

06

Monitoring on freshness

Alerts on data age and queue depth, so a stalled pipeline surfaces as an alert rather than a question in a meeting.

How it goes

From disagreeing systems to one record

  1. 01

    Flow and field audit

    One week

    We follow the records that matter through every system, list the fields in conflict and mark the system of record for each.

  2. 02

    Schema and contract

    One to two weeks

    Event schemas, versioning rules and the write contract per system, agreed in writing with the people who own each side.

  3. 03

    Pipeline build

    Three to six weeks

    Connectors, the queue, idempotent writes, retries, dead letter handling and the first reconciliation report on real data.

  4. 04

    Monitoring and handover

    One to two weeks

    Freshness alerts, replay procedure, runbooks and a walkthrough with whoever will be on call for it.

Artefacts

What you receive

Written record

Data flow map across systems

Versioned event schema documents

System of record decision per field

Replay and backfill procedure

The system

Source code in your own repository

Connectors and schema definitions under version control

Idempotent write paths with tests

Dead letter store with payload and reason

Operations

Scheduled reconciliation reports

Freshness and queue depth alerts

Runbook for a failed or stalled run

Handover session recording

Pipelines run inside your own cloud account and credentials stay in your secret store. We never hold sole access.

Questions

Questions we get about integrations and data

Next step

Pick the handoff that breaks most often

Book a technical assessment

30 minutes with an engineer, no sales call