Software development
We write the codebase your team will still be able to read in two years, and the integrations that keep it connected to everything else you run.
30 minutes with an engineer, no sales call
What this means here
A first version can be produced quickly by almost anyone. What decides the cost of the next two years is whether the boundaries of the system are typed, whether the paths that carry money, data and access are covered by tests, and whether a second engineer can change a module without reading all of it. We treat those three as delivery requirements, not as polish to add later.
So every change goes through review before it ships, every module has a stated owner and a stated contract, and the setup, deployment and failure notes live in your repository next to the code they describe. When something breaks at eleven at night, the person on call reads a runbook instead of guessing. That is the difference between a codebase you keep and one you rewrite.
Capabilities
Web platforms and internal tools shaped around the workflow you actually run, not around a template that needs your process bent to fit it. We model the domain first, keep the data layer explicit, and ship a working increment early so you judge something real rather than a mockup.
Assistants that answer from your own documents and records, and agents that complete a defined task and stop. We keep retrieval, prompts and tool access in version control, log every call, and put a human decision point wherever an action cannot be undone.
APIs, webhooks and event pipelines between the systems you already pay for, with one agreed version of each operational record. Failures retry, duplicates are detected, and every transfer can be replayed, so a broken afternoon does not turn into a week of reconciliation.
How we work
We read the code, the data and the deployment path, then write down what holds, what will break and what we would change first.
Named deliverables in sequence, with owners and a defined edge, so a change of scope is a decision rather than a surprise.
Something running in your environment that you can use and judge, early enough to change direction cheaply.
Tests on the paths that would hurt, pipelines anyone can run, and written setup, deployment and failure notes in your repository.
Reviewed increments at a pace you set, with the option to take the work in house at any point.
Build readiness check
Answer honestly and the panel on the right names the areas we would work on first. There is no score and no email field, and your answers never leave this page.
Reading
Answer all five and this panel names the areas to work on first. Nothing you select leaves your browser, and nothing is stored.
This check runs entirely in your browser. No answers are saved, sent or used to produce an estimate.
What you get
Repository in your organisation from day one
Typed boundaries between modules and services
Tests on money, data and access paths
Review history on every merged change
Reproducible environments described in code
One command build and deploy pipeline
Rollback path exercised, not assumed
Monitoring that points at a cause
Architecture notes written as we build
Runbook for the failures we expect
Environment and access inventory
Handover session recorded for your team
All of it sits in your accounts and your repository. If you take the work to another team, nothing has to be extracted from us first.
Stack and standards
These are our defaults for a new build. Each one is here because it removes a class of problem we would otherwise have to manage by hand.
When you already have a stack, we work in it. We have no interest in a rewrite to suit our preferences, and we will say plainly when a migration would cost more than it returns.
Questions
Next step
One reply from an engineer, usually within one business day.